<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A penny for the New York Times&#8217; thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://02a8865.netsolhost.com/blog/2009/04/28/a-penny-for-the-new-york-times-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://02a8865.netsolhost.com/blog/2009/04/28/a-penny-for-the-new-york-times-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Good work that does good.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://02a8865.netsolhost.com/blog/2009/04/28/a-penny-for-the-new-york-times-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tellhetrick.com/blog/?p=473#comment-499</guid>
		<description>I'm with you. It seems to me that the demise of newspapers results from the owners' lack of foresight to realize that online content should've never been free. And now here I sit, with access to newspapers across the country that cost me nothing while the reporters and editors who work at those papers are losing their jobs or, at least, a good chunk of their paychecks. I read The Washington Post and the NYT for government stories, and The Seattle Times for news on Starbucks and the Seahawks. I would pay for the stories I want to read, but I don't have to.

I pay for the paper version of The Star for Indianapolis news; perhaps I should get the online version for free, or for a small additional fee. Those who want online-only version can subscribe to it just as I do to the paper. Or people could pick among the online stories and purchase them individually.

The best way to get local news is through well-written stories done by local journalists. Here's hoping newspaper management figures it out before all the local journalists--and the papers they worked for--are gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you. It seems to me that the demise of newspapers results from the owners&#8217; lack of foresight to realize that online content should&#8217;ve never been free. And now here I sit, with access to newspapers across the country that cost me nothing while the reporters and editors who work at those papers are losing their jobs or, at least, a good chunk of their paychecks. I read The Washington Post and the NYT for government stories, and The Seattle Times for news on Starbucks and the Seahawks. I would pay for the stories I want to read, but I don&#8217;t have to.</p>
<p>I pay for the paper version of The Star for Indianapolis news; perhaps I should get the online version for free, or for a small additional fee. Those who want online-only version can subscribe to it just as I do to the paper. Or people could pick among the online stories and purchase them individually.</p>
<p>The best way to get local news is through well-written stories done by local journalists. Here&#8217;s hoping newspaper management figures it out before all the local journalists&#8211;and the papers they worked for&#8211;are gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
